| Jens Thieme views and discussions | Jens Thieme views and discussions | Jens Thieme views and discussions

Die Grundprinzipien demokratischen Diskurses werden attackiert - von allen Seiten

Meinungsfreiheit gilt nach allen Richtungen, vor allem wenn selbsternannte Moralisten anderen die Meinung verbieten, weil sie die 'Wahrheitsfindung' alleine für sich in Anspruch nehmen.

Sie sind ein extrem gefährlicher Mann Herr Freimüller!

Und Sie haben die Grundprinzipien demokratischen Diskurses nicht verstanden.

Es bleibt zu hoffen, dass die weniger kritischen Leser Ihrer Kolumnen ihrer Totalitärblase entkommen können.

Und an die Redakteure der Berner Zeitung:

Hier wird nicht 'gekämpft' sondern versucht Meinungsbildung zu verhindern und Meinungsfreiheit auszuhebeln.

Es ist beängstigend mit welchem Dilettantismus hier von der Betitelung bis zu 'Trumps Twitter' gewerkelt wird.

Für alle, denen Meinungsfreiheit ein wertvolles Gut ist, die Kampagnenseite des Herrn Freimüller:

Mich schaudern sämtliche Extreme der politischen Spektren und es ist essentiell, deren Stimme ungefiltert zugänglich zu finden.

Den Gegnern der Grundfeste demokratischer Auseinandersetzung scheint das weniger ins Wertegerüst zu passen.

Hier bietet es sich an zu fragen: Warum?

Is Bannonism upon us?

What does Steve Bannon really want?

There is no such thing as irrational behavior in execution of greater power.

There are visions and influential variables that lend direction, diversion or (all so purposely) deception to a projected path how the visions are accomplished.

When you want to understand drastic events to inform your assumptions for future direction, it might be wise to recognize and understand key influences to those events.

So, here you go: is Bannonism recognizable in recent events and more importantly: will it play out in its literal meaning and intent?

If so: we can only hope that other influencers are much, much stronger and globally intertwined or we all risk to fall victim to the most violent of visions.

Wir haben den Tod der attischen Demokratie erlaubt!

Beteiligung und Verantwortung Aller im demokratischen und gesellschaftlichen Prozess statt Massenmissionierung und/oder Isolation der Einflusslosen.

Die Eliten der Neuzeit haben eigennützig und klammheimlich das Fundament der attischen Demokratie abgeschaltet!

Korrigiert auf Inklusion aller Mitglieder der Gesellschaft und Bevölkerungsgruppen und angepasst auf Machbarkeit in der heutigen Welt, würde das demokratische Gerüst heute auf diesen Prinzipien basieren:

  • Auslosen (und nicht Wahl!) zeitlich begrenzter, gleichrangiger Volksvertreter, gesamthafter Stimmanteil von 49% bei allen Referenden
  • 10-15% der Bevölkerung übt zeitgleich ein Volksmandat aus, das sich aus dem Erfahrungshintergrund ergibt
  • jeder Bürger hat ein Mandat pro Lebenszeit
  • wichtige Entscheidungen werden durch unabhängige, balancierte Expertengruppen debattenreif vorbereitet und mit Quorum und einfacher Mehrheit entschieden
  • korrigierende Entscheidungen folgen dem gleichen Prinzip
  • vorherige Volksvertreter üben ehrenamtliche Beratermandate aus, nehmen so indirekt weiterhin am Gestaltungsprozess teil und stellen Wissenstransfer sicher

Die modernen Demokratien haben sich entdemokratisiert und bevor dieser Prozess weiter beschleunigt wird, könnten wir uns mit den Fundamenten und Modernisierungschancen künftiger Gesellschaftssysteme auseinandersetzen.

We allowed the death of the Athenian Democracy!

Participation and accountability of all in the democratic and societal process instead of mass proselytization and/or isolation of uninfluential factions.

Modern elites have selfishly and silently eliminated the very foundation of the Athenian Democracy!

Corrected with inclusion of all members of society and populous factions and considering feasibility in the modern world, the democratic fabric could today consist of these elements:

  • draw (not election!) of temporary, equal representatives, exercising an accumulated 49% of any popular vote
  • 10-15% of the population respond to a representative mandate at the same time which is tuned to their experience
  • there is only one mandate per lifetime
  • important decisions are prepared for debate by balanced, independent expert groups and are decided upon by quorum with simple majority vote
  • corrective measures follow the same process
  • former representatives act as volunteer consultants to continue to participate in the design processes and to ensure knowledge transfer

Modern democracies seem to de-democratize themselves and before this process further accelerates it might make sense to consider their foundation and modernization opportunities

A false claim of violating the U.S. sanctions to Iran destroying an amazing talent

Mahmoud Reza Banki (Persian: محمود رضا بانکی), an Iranian-American scientist and management consultant was - unjustly - arrested and charged with violating US sanctions against Iran by the United States Attorney.

Ultimately Mahmoud Reza Banki won his case on appeal - but he still lost everything he amazingly accomplished.

Another heavy price paid by an innocent victim of a flawed law system. It is utterly disturbing how carelessly and violently lives are shattered by scores of people that are accountable in such cases- from attorneys to judged to the jury - and base their massively impacting judgements on false or missing evidence.

Or - as in Mahmoud Reza Banki's case - accepting constructed diversions from the truth and established law. It is also a reminder of the vulnerability before a system that can crush anyone's existence while it claims to protect and uphold justice for all.


Yaphank - a shocking REAL piece of Nazi history in the U.S.

Can you imagine how the North American continent would look like today if Hitler Germany had won the war?

In a recent NPR feature about The Man in the High Castle I was shocked to learn about the very real Nazi history of Yaphank, New York.

Yaphank was home to Camp Siegfried, a summer camp which promoted Nazi ideology. It was owned and operated by the German American Bund, an American Nazi organization devoted to promoting a favorable view of Nazi Germany.

Yaphank Long Island, NY Nazi Parade near Camp Siegfried

Camp Siegfried was one of many such camps in the US in the 1930s, including Camp Hindenberg in Grafton, Wisconsin, Camp Nordland in Andover, New Jersey and Deutschhorst Country Club in Sellersville, Pennsylvania.

It is intriguing and scary to imagine how such seeds were planted and nurtured back then. Let alone today when we all should be educated to know much better.

Following the TV Show The Man in the High Castle provides a troubling insight into the inner workings of unbalanced power and corruption at all levels of society.

Camp Siegfried was finally shut down by the US government when Germany declared war on the United States.

Disruption abound

Do the many unforeseen or ‘unthinkable’ developments since 2014 onwards reveal significant failings of modern leadership?

Thinking The Unthinkable is a rolling, ongoing, dynamic investigation into why leaders have appeared more unable or unwilling than ever to anticipate the biggest issues of our time. Since 2014 these have included the new assertiveness of President Putin’s Russia, the rise of so-called ‘Islamic state’ the sudden oil price crash, growing cyber-vulnerability, and the exponential growth in mass migration and people movements.

We started our investigation in 2015, under the Churchill 2015 21st Century Statesmanship Global Leaders Programme. It was set up to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Sir Winston Churchill’s death. It was a time when many were asking if contemporary leadership matches that of Sir Winston during World War Two. Our “Thinking The Unthinkable” inquiry began as part of the Churchill15 Programme. It has since developed its own dynamic.

Fleetwood Mac, Stevie Nicks, Dreams (Take 2)

Dreams (Take 2)

Now here you go again
You say you want your freedom
Well who am I to keep you down
It's only right that you should
Play the way you feel it
But listen carefully to the sound
Of your loneliness
Like a heartbeat...drives you mad
In the stillness of remembering what you had
And what you lost...
And what you had...
And what you lost
Thunder only happens when it's raining
Players only love you when they're playing
Say...Women...they will come and they will go
When the rain washes you'll know
Now here I go again, I see the crystal visions
I keep my visions to myself
It's only me
Who wants to wrap around your dreams and...
Have you any dreams you'd like to sell?
Dreams of loneliness...
Like a heartbeat...drives you mad...
In the stillness of remembering what you had...
And what you lost
What you had...
And what you lost
Thunder only happens when it's raining
Players only love you when they're playing
Say...Women...they will come and they will go
When the rain washes you'll know

Fleetwood Mac - Landslide - 2004 (Stevie Nicks, Lindsey Buckingham, Live In Boston - Say You Will Tour)


I took my love and I took it down
I climbed a mountain and I turned around
And I saw my reflection in the snow-covered hills
Well, the landslide brought me down

Oh, mirror in the sky, what is love
Can the child within my heart rise above
Can I sail through the changing ocean tides
Can I handle the seasons of my life

Uh uh, uh uh, uh uh, oh

Well, I've been afraid of changin'
'Cause I've built my life around you
But time makes you bolder
Children get older
And I'm getting older too

Well, I've been afraid of changin'
'Cause I've built my life around you
But time makes you bolder
Children get older
And I'm getting older too
Well, I'm getting older too

So take this love and take it down
Yeah, and if you climb a mountain and you turn around
And if you see my reflection in the snow-covered hills
Well, the landslide brought it down

And if you see my reflection in the snow-covered hills
Well maybe, well maybe, well maybe
A landslide will bring you down


Fleetwood Mac - Landslide - 2004 (Stevie Nicks, Lindsey Buckingham, Live In Boston - Say You Will Tour)

5 ways to care for human rights in a very personal way

What can you do to support human rights in a very personal way?

  1. Visit the websites or social media platforms of the human rights organization of your choice.

  2. Use their search function and look for the human rights causes you want to support.

  3. Engage, donate, motivate others.

  4. Simply hit that LIKE or FOLLOW button so their updates appear in your news feed and you can follow urgent actions, human rights cases and successes.

  5. Confront your government representative: find their contact form or email address and ask them what THEY ACTIVELY DO to support the human rights causes that you personally care about.

How many minutes or cents did you spent in the last 12 months to add your voice and support against the dark side of society?

How many minutes or cents did you spent in the last 12 months that do not add any value to anything at all?

5 ways to care for human rights in a very personal way

5 ways to care for human rights in a very personal way

Google account hacking attempt through ‘Suspicious sign in prevented’ email

I received an email by 'Google' informing me about a suspicious sign-in attempt that they 'prevented'.


It's a great service but I became alert by the included button to access my account.

I didn't use that button but logged into my Google Account settings manually where you can control the devices and apps that are used for access.

There was NO matching alert message which proves that this seemingly supportive message from 'Google' is designed to steal my login info in disguise to protect just that.

Glad I fired up my inbox AFTER a strong coffee this morning or I might have given away my password and who knows what else in the process.

NEVER CLICK ANY LINK OR BUTTON in email messages that ask for account login. ALWAYS go to the provider's account login page manually and log in there.

I never forget my hundreds of passwords - and they are super safe!

Here is why I never have to write down a password anymore and I never use the same one! It works like a charm. It is impossible to forget my passwords and they are really, really safe.

Step 1: Find a word combination you love and you can't forget anymore because you love it so much, say: 'vanilla ice cream'.

Step 2: Make it safer: 'V@n1ll@1c3cr3@m'.
You simply capitalize the first letter and replace the 'a' with '@', the 'e' with '3' and the 'i' with '1'.

This is pretty darn safe already. Two replacements will do too. Or capitalize any other or more letters.

This is your master password. NEVER tell anyone!

Never use it without step 3!
Once it gets cracked, the angry bots might crack all your other accounts that use that password too in a matter of yocto seconds.

That's why you need specific passwords for each service you use. And this is where the next and final step comes in:

Step 3: By default, add a first or second PLUS a last or second last or third last digit (_) with the beginning and end letter of the service you use the password for.

Let's say I decide to add a first and second last digit.

So, when I use my master password '_V@n1ll@1c3cr3@_m' for Facebook I add an 'f' in first position and a 'k' in second last.

My Facebook password would be: 'fV@n1ll@1c3cr3@km'.

Applying the exact same rule to other services:

My Google password would be 'gV@n1ll@1c3cr3@em'.

My Twitter password would be 'tV@n1ll@1c3cr3@rm'.

Basically: you always use the same, safe master password but you add one or two or three letters from any position out of your service name to make the password individual to any service.

It's super safe because:

Your master password is long and looks bonkers, doesn't make sense in any dictionary, is unique for any service you use it for and it's written down nowhere but in your brain.

This is how you will never forget passwords anymore - you're welcome.

Unfortunately the IT gods are morons. So, some companies expose nonsense rules on you like 'only 6 digits, no special symbols', etc.

Someone should put those idiots in jail.

It is changing, albeit slowly. As long as those idiots haven't gotten their security act together yet, you'll need short, less safe versions to cover those services.

And yes, you might have to write them down. Until those exceptions vanish.

And don't forget to send their webmaster a hint that they're living in the post Commodore era.

Loud facts about my hometown Leipzig

My hometown turned 1000 years this year and I was able to celebrate it too, despite the 1000km distance.

A couple of facts I bet you didn’t know:

Leipzig World records:

- oldest newspaper

- oldest trade fair

- largest heart treatment center

- first binary computing machine

- first nuclear accident

- largest professional orchestra

- largest gothic festival

- largest Zoo apes installation 

- first left-handed piano

- largest outdoors advent calendar

- first power generator

- biggest cloud simulator

- only left hand-start organ

- oldest book museum 

- oldest wood nail

- first cable car

- first hockey world cup

- largest intercity trade show building

- first free HD movie

- first trade show building

- biggest inflatable waterslide

- oldest string quartet 

- largest oil painting

- first fireworks world cup

- first weather maps

- largest plant register

- oldest hammer piano

- first mass battle

- biggest advertising banner

- largest solar power station

- oldest thermometer 

- biggest farmhouse breakfast dish


Leipzig Europe records:

- first industrial railway station

- largest intercity public passage system

- largest literature festival

- largest Gründerzeit quarter

- longest building epigraph

- longest sewage canal 

- biggest memorial

- largest tropic house

- longest military barrack 

- tallest indoor climbing wall

- biggest head station by area

- largest intercity floodplain forest

- largest pyramid

- biggest ceiling painting

- biggest energy trading platform


Leipzig Germany records:

- first librarian school

- first publisher association 

- first music library

- first commercial chemistry laboratory 

- biggest gay sauna

- oldest cinema 

- largest trampoline park

- first online divorce

- first medical periodical

- first anti war book

- first hotel without personnel

- first labour party

- first street gas lamp

- largest musical instruments collection

- fist blood registry

- first national bank

- first state bank

- oldest radio orchestra

- fist airport hotel

- fist buddhist community

- oldest mail order catalogue retailer

- first public ladies pool

- oldest public school

- first women society

- longest trams

- first football radio

- highest court

- oldest café

- tallest city hall tower

- first ‘Tatort’ was called ‘Taxi to Leipzig’

- first encyclopedia

- oldest art publisher

- first children’s magazine

- largest city plaza

- first music gymnasium

- first children's theater

- first theater university

- first school for the hearing impaired 

- oldest botanic garden

- first female doctor 

- first balloon mail flight

- first Bach memorial

- first university radio station 

- first women’s high school

- first marathon

- first city map

- first dog wash


007 James Bond Spectre vs Skyfall (Spectre Swiss Pre-Premiere)

Spectre - Spoiler Alert!



I’m not a critic, but a critical fan.
I’ve watched all Bonds several times, I own them all.
Spectre was a disappointment but you should still watch it!

In fact, the Bond franchise should be a school standard if I’d call the shots.

I learned last night (if I didn’t already know), that Skyfall is the perfect Bond.
Basically for all the right reasons that were turned to all the wrongs in Spectre.

Spectre sports one of the best opening sequences in the 007 history.
Flattening half a city block inside 5 minutes among thousands of people celebrating the Day of the Dead is as breathtaking as you'd hope and photographed spectacularly, mostly by drone cameras.
I just don’t get the first girl Estrella as there is no history, no relation, no character, instead a vague hint of an erotic moment without any reason before 007 takes off to rid the world of Monica Bellucci’s hubby.

And this is where the trouble starts.
Almost all new characters are either not introduced at all or with such a rush that there is no time to fall for them.

As Bellucci appears, she’s got no anchor in the plot at all. 
Bond humps her ten seconds after he meets her, pretty much at the same time as he saves her life in a (nicely choreographed) double flash kill - only to leave her in a rush (still normal Bond style) but without her re-appearing on the silver screen ever again. 

Useless and flat. 
She lends no character or mystery to the remainder of the story.
She’s just gone. 
Retired I guess.

Léa Seydoux is given a tad more time to fill her character with life, but she fails by mostly staring scared or wondering at some (arguably) drastic scenes where I’d have wished a bit of emotion or soul shining in her ice cold eyes. 

She’s got nice lips and wears the most stunning dress you’ll ever see in Cinema - but that’s pretty much it - too.

What a shame!
Right after I trembled in excitement when he educated the new C. about Bond’s Ying & Yang job profile (“He’s also got the license not to kill!”) M. turns down the best volley cross the writers could have penciled into the script for him:

Deciding to cut 007 off to safe what’s left of the mission and hope, I would have loved at least the idea of some sort of an inner struggle or an ice cold dark joke for that matter. 

We all remember the old M. and how she was allowed to excel in such moments!

None of which was presented so I was left with a mailman who delivers the weekly TV mag by dumping it on the front lawn from a fast racing bicycle.

M. does have a couple of small witty scenes later however.
But nothing beyond normal expectation for his character.

And why did the writers rush Ms Moneypenny through the scenes with an alarming lack of reflective humor as we loved her for it in Skyfall so-so much? 

She gets to show off a set of most unbelievably erotic underwear however, so I won’t complain too much but I still feel sad for Naomie Harris as an actress.

The number of sizable jokes seem to be halfed compared to Skyfall which proves a lack of bravery and, again: too many meaningless sidesteps that did not help to paint a bigger picture but stole valuable time out of the longest Bond ever, would you believe it.

Speaking of bigger picture: there are two.
And both of them are equally lame and shallow.

Threading a wild count of former Bond characters together as mini masterminds of their past assignments to lead to the uber mastermind who is introduced to have been behind it all from the outset, makes no sense whatsoever and seems nothing but desperately squeezed out of an uncreative screen wright.

To make matters worse: Christoph Waltz, who can scare the bejeezus out of the most evil monsters even if he has to play their pudding spoon, fails miserably in living up to that potential uber scare.

He’s got nothing behind a technical tick-off-the-boxes process that could remotely earn my respect in that character.

I understand that you can’t top off Bardem or even Waltz himself in the Basterds flick.

But when you have the audacity to tap into the franchise’s core moments with their blood freezing performances, you better make all of them look like lollipops in a Barney & Friends show candy store.

I guess someone just wanted to place the weakest line of monologue into the plot ("I am the cause of all your pain"). But if you really want to see a brotherly relation going brutally sour, turn to Dexter for crying out loud.

When Andrew Scott makes his appearance as C. you'd bet you are in for a treat when you enjoyed him in Sherlock of late.

Only: the half knitted and preposterous big data freak show that manages to only scratch on the surface of pretty much any tabloid shout-out about the matter, and the lame dialogues without any depth at all, fail his extraordinary capabilities to show utter evil in a weirdly lovable face.

Everything about his role is predictable and lacks depth and mystery.

Epic fail: the way he goes.

Everything seems to be as rushed and mindlessly, carelessly executed and designed as our common world and life styles nowadays under the pressure of same such topics that the writers try to address but fail to lead anywhere.

If there is a hidden sociatal criticism in this general impression: then kudos - but I doubt any intention. For the price of disappointment and utter boredom no less.

I could go on and on about the minor and bigger disappointments from last night’s Swiss pre-premier but I want to end on a positive note or two.

Thank you for Hinx and his brutal dumbness and yet creative evilness that accounted for some rare Bond-like entertainment highlights. He was the only character able to scare me and enjoy at the same time.

But what I enjoyed most of all was Q. of all people as he was already increasing charm, wit and a sense of loyal, humanistic nerdyness in Skyfall. 

Only to exceed my expectations with a forced field trip (hilarious): he felt so incredibly uncomfortable at, that it hurt watching his every step outside his craft bunker and answering 007’s call for action with “I have a mortgage and two cats to attend to”.

Only to top it off with a genius word play in reflection of 007’s Aston Martin (Aaaaah, the M10!!!) treatment record (I won't spoil it here as it was my only moment of uncontrolled laughter in this movie).

A shiny moment in what I still consider a proper but disappointing Bond for they outperformed themselves with Skyfall - so, I know it’s hard to live up to.

To sum it up: none of the girls die in this Bond, nor would it make any sense to kill them off as there wouldn’t be anything to be angry or sad about. 

Gone are the nights as you wept into your pillow upon Vesper's mystery and formidably designed tragic vanishing into heavy waters.

To me there were many lost opportunities and even more dull moments in both character and dialogues that we have seen many times ways better written and performed.